You do not have any favourites
News
-
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
24th February 2023 -
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
23rd February 2023 -
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
22nd February 2023 -
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
21st February 2023 -
HOW THE CADASTRAL REFERENCE VALUE AFFECTS THE SALE OF THE HOME AFTER A DIVORCE OR INHERITANCE
20th February 2023 -
HOW THE CADASTRAL REFERENCE VALUE AFFECTS THE SALE OF THE HOME AFTER A DIVORCE OR INHERITANCE
19th February 2023 -
HOW THE CADASTRAL REFERENCE VALUE AFFECTS THE SALE OF THE HOME AFTER A DIVORCE OR INHERITANCE
18th February 2023 -
IT IS POSSIBLE TO RECTIFY THE EQUITY GAINS IN THE IRPF ONCE THE INCOME CAMPAIGN IS FINISHED
17th February 2023 -
Spain, fourth most attractive European country to invest in 2023, according to CBRE
16th February 2023 -
THE BANCO DE ESPAÑA ASKS THE BANKS NOT TO GENERATE FALSE EXPECTATIONS IN THEIR RECORD CAMPAIGNS
15th February 2023
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
26th May 2021REAL ESTATE, NEXUS GROUP, INFORMA
Regarding the second group of judgments, Ragel Sánchez rightly criticizes said jurisprudential position by stating that our highest Court attributes the concept of merchant to someone who is not; With regard to the third group of judgments cited, they are also criticized by said author for understanding that they invoke a precept such as art. 1362 which refers "exclusively" to the internal sphere of relations between spouses and cannot be used by third parties (creditors) since our CC could have followed a model such as the Italian one in which the action of any spouse in the interest of the legitimate family to attack common goods, so in such a case said distinction between internal and external sphere would be superfluous, which by the way is defended in our country by some minority doctrine.
This has not been the case and except in the case of non-contractual obligations (art. 1366) in which our CC if exceptionally follows the criterion of family interest, as a general rule it has opted for the French system of distinguishing between the internal sphere (" expenses "in charge of the community of community) with exclusive effects between spouses and external (responsibility) with effects against third parties, not being lawful as our courts do to invoke in the external field art. 1362.4th CC. same erroneous criterion.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960