You do not have any favourites
News
-
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
24th February 2023 -
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
23rd February 2023 -
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
22nd February 2023 -
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
21st February 2023 -
HOW THE CADASTRAL REFERENCE VALUE AFFECTS THE SALE OF THE HOME AFTER A DIVORCE OR INHERITANCE
20th February 2023 -
HOW THE CADASTRAL REFERENCE VALUE AFFECTS THE SALE OF THE HOME AFTER A DIVORCE OR INHERITANCE
19th February 2023 -
HOW THE CADASTRAL REFERENCE VALUE AFFECTS THE SALE OF THE HOME AFTER A DIVORCE OR INHERITANCE
18th February 2023 -
IT IS POSSIBLE TO RECTIFY THE EQUITY GAINS IN THE IRPF ONCE THE INCOME CAMPAIGN IS FINISHED
17th February 2023 -
Spain, fourth most attractive European country to invest in 2023, according to CBRE
16th February 2023 -
THE BANCO DE ESPAÑA ASKS THE BANKS NOT TO GENERATE FALSE EXPECTATIONS IN THEIR RECORD CAMPAIGNS
15th February 2023
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
27th May 2021REAL ESTATE, NEXUS GROUP, INFORMA
The erroneous doctrine of previous jurisprudence is so consolidated that even in matters of consumer legislation our highest Court denies the partner's spouse the protection of said special legislation when the same, normally the wife, secures together with the partner husband a debt of the company This is not due to the fact that she is a member, which she is not, but exclusively due to the fact that in such case, in accordance with articles 6 and following of the Commercial Code, she must respond with all the joint assets (judgment of November 7 2017) and this even if the merchant is the company and the partner of said entity is the husband. Moreover, as the judgment of May 28, 2020 of the Supreme Court points out, even if it had not signed, it would respond in the same way, since by the mere fact of being "co-owner of the capital stock"
Although she had not signed the loan as a joint guarantor, since her husband did so, she is jointly liable for his bond, as we collected in judgment 594/2017, of November 7.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960