You do not have any favourites
News
-
THE 100 MOST EXPENSIVE AND DEMANDED POPULATIONS TO BUY A HOME THIS 2023
14th February 2023 -
THE 100 MOST EXPENSIVE AND DEMANDED POPULATIONS TO BUY A HOME THIS 2023
13th February 2023 -
WHAT TO DO TO SAVE ELECTRICITY, REAL ESTATE, GRUPO NEXUS, INFORMA
9th July 2022 -
WHAT TO DO TO SAVE ELECTRICITY, REAL ESTATE, GRUPO NEXUS, INFORMA
8th July 2022 -
WHAT TO DO TO SAVE ELECTRICITY, REAL ESTATE, GRUPO NEXUS, INFORMA
7th July 2022 -
REAL ESTATE, GRUPO NEXUS, TIPS TO GET A ZEN HOUSE
5th July 2022 -
REAL ESTATE, GRUPO NEXUS, TIPS TO GET A ZEN HOUSE
4th July 2022 -
10 REASONS NOT TO SELL A PROPERTY BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS
2nd July 2022 -
10 REASONS NOT TO SELL A PROPERTY BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS
1st July 2022 -
10 REASONS NOT TO SELL A PROPERTY BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS
30th June 2022
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
3rd June 2021Thirdly, and in line with what was expressed in the previous paragraph, the question arises of determining in the case of opposition to the exercise of the trade of art. 10 CCom what goods respond. It is clear that the proprietary goods of the merchant and the joint assets "acquired with the results of the trade" respond, highlighting the doctrine the non-derogable or "jus cogens" nature of the responsibility of the latter that proclaims the art. 6 CCom. It is clear that the private property of the spouse who has opposed or his half of the property is not liable, but what about half of the property of the merchant in which the case of those acquired as a result of trade does not reach fifty percent of the entire estate? common?
From the literal reading of art. 6 CCom could be deduced that they do not respond ("for the other common goods to be bound, the consent of both spouses will be necessary" says the article), but that cannot be the interpretation
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960