You do not have any favourites
News
-
The landlords’ rental requirements: Most houses don’t stay on the market for even 24 hours.
6th October 2025 -
Dampness on terraces: the court clarifies who pays, the owner or the community
1st October 2025 -
Pretending you have an alarm can be costly: up to 600 euros a day if you use a company’s name without hiring them.
14th August 2025 -
Creditworthiness check for renting: what is it and how to do it?
29th July 2025 -
Sareb transfers 40,000 homes and 2,400 plots of land to Sepes: where are the homes located
28th July 2025 -
From Madrid to Lisbon or Milan: this is the state of housing prices for buying or renting in Italy, Spain, and Portugal
23rd July 2025 -
Ley de Vivienda (Año II): crisis en el alquiler con más demanda, menos oferta y precios disparados
27th May 2025 -
The development of residential complexes for seniors is growing: there are already more than 5,400 housing units
22nd May 2025 -
According to BBVA Research, housing prices will increase by 7.3% in 2025 and by 5.3% in 2026
19th May 2025 -
Home sales surge by 40% and record their best March since 2007
16th May 2025
Dampness on terraces: the court clarifies who pays, the owner or the community
1st October 2025
A ruling by the Provincial Court of Granada, issued on June 27, 2025, reinforces the legal position on who should bear the costs of dampness leaking from a terrace into the apartment below. The court concluded that if the source lies in structural defects — such as failures in waterproofing or water drainage systems — the community of property owners is responsible, not the attic owner.
The decision is based on Article 396 of the Civil Code, which considers floor slabs and roofs as common elements of the building. It also refers to Article 348 of the Civil Procedure Act, giving full credibility to the expert report that identified a structural origin of the damage.
Furthermore, certain community statutes were rejected as invalid since they were not registered in the Land Registry, as required by Article 5 of the Horizontal Property Act.
The Supreme Court's doctrine (Judgment No. 80/2024) supports this view: if the damage originates from structural elements, the community is responsible. Only in cases of misuse or negligent private modifications will the cost fall on the owner.