You do not have any favourites
News
-
HOW TO LEGALLY RENT OUT MY HOME FOR VACATION?
5th July 2023 -
WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO HOUSING PRICES IN THE NEXT THREE YEARS?
4th July 2023 -
THE POLICE ADVISE: HOW TO AVOID GETTING ROBBED AT HOME DURING VACATIONS
3rd July 2023 -
THE DREAM MANSION OF BARBIE IN MALIBU IS UP FOR RENT AGAIN, BUT... FOR ONLY TWO NIGHTS AND FOR FREE.
2nd July 2023 -
THE 'CELESTIAL' AND '90S-INSPIRED' DECORATION THAT HAS GONE VIRAL ON TIKTOK
1st July 2023 -
INCREASE IN VACATION RENTAL SCAMS: TIPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM FRAUDS
30th June 2023 -
THE SECRET TO MAKE YOUR HOME RENOVATION A SUCCESS... NOT A NIGHTMARE
27th June 2023 -
TIPS ON HOW TO PREPARE YOUR HOUSE BEFORE GOING ON VACATION.
26th June 2023 -
AN ALICANTE-BASED APPLICATION HAS MANAGED TO REDESIGN THE INTERIORS OF HOMES FROM MOBILE PHONES USING AI.
25th June 2023 -
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
25th February 2023
THE DEADLINE TO CLAIM MORTGAGE EXPENSES REACHES THE CJEU
27th August 2021REAL ESTATE, NEXUS GROUP, INFORMA.
Contradictory Sentences
On October 28, 2017, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the lender, requesting the nullity of the aforementioned clause and the restitution of the amounts unduly paid as a result of its application.
After the opposition of the defendant, the judgment of first instance upheld the claim, declared the clause invalid and ordered the lender to pay the borrowers various amounts that they had paid as notary fees, registration of the property and management, plus your legal interests from the date consumers made such payments.
The Provincial Court, partially upholding the appeal filed by the bank, declared the action to claim the amounts paid for expenses prescribed and consequently acquitted the lender, without imposing costs in both instances.
The Provincial Court considered that the initial day for the calculation of the limitation period of the restitution action was the day on which the consumers had made the undue payments, in 1999, so the action was prescribed, as more 15 years old when they filed the lawsuit.
Finally, the plaintiffs filed a cassation appeal against the judgment of the Provincial Court, which is currently known to the High Court
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960