You do not have any favourites
News
-
HOW TO LEGALLY RENT OUT MY HOME FOR VACATION?
5th July 2023 -
WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO HOUSING PRICES IN THE NEXT THREE YEARS?
4th July 2023 -
THE POLICE ADVISE: HOW TO AVOID GETTING ROBBED AT HOME DURING VACATIONS
3rd July 2023 -
THE DREAM MANSION OF BARBIE IN MALIBU IS UP FOR RENT AGAIN, BUT... FOR ONLY TWO NIGHTS AND FOR FREE.
2nd July 2023 -
THE 'CELESTIAL' AND '90S-INSPIRED' DECORATION THAT HAS GONE VIRAL ON TIKTOK
1st July 2023 -
INCREASE IN VACATION RENTAL SCAMS: TIPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM FRAUDS
30th June 2023 -
THE SECRET TO MAKE YOUR HOME RENOVATION A SUCCESS... NOT A NIGHTMARE
27th June 2023 -
TIPS ON HOW TO PREPARE YOUR HOUSE BEFORE GOING ON VACATION.
26th June 2023 -
AN ALICANTE-BASED APPLICATION HAS MANAGED TO REDESIGN THE INTERIORS OF HOMES FROM MOBILE PHONES USING AI.
25th June 2023 -
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VACATIONAL AND SEASONAL RENTAL
25th February 2023
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
3rd June 2021Thirdly, and in line with what was expressed in the previous paragraph, the question arises of determining in the case of opposition to the exercise of the trade of art. 10 CCom what goods respond. It is clear that the proprietary goods of the merchant and the joint assets "acquired with the results of the trade" respond, highlighting the doctrine the non-derogable or "jus cogens" nature of the responsibility of the latter that proclaims the art. 6 CCom. It is clear that the private property of the spouse who has opposed or his half of the property is not liable, but what about half of the property of the merchant in which the case of those acquired as a result of trade does not reach fifty percent of the entire estate? common?
From the literal reading of art. 6 CCom could be deduced that they do not respond ("for the other common goods to be bound, the consent of both spouses will be necessary" says the article), but that cannot be the interpretation
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960