You do not have any favourites
News
-
Feijóo criticizes Sánchez's housing policy:
13th November 2025 -
How to detect fake documentation from a potential tenant
12th November 2025 -
BBVA anticipates that housing prices will rise another 7% in 2026.
11th November 2025 -
How can I know the energy efficiency of my home?
3rd November 2025 -
ERC pressures the PSOE and brings to Congress its bill to create a tax starting from the third home
30th October 2025 -
Are we becoming a nation of tenants? Rent accounts for 20% of the total.
26th October 2025 -
Hernández Reche: "We are heading towards another housing bubble, although it is different from the one in 2008."
23rd October 2025 -
Rodríguez advocates for intervention in the housing market amid criticism from PP and Sumar.
22nd October 2025 -
The government backtracks and will propose freezing the social security contributions of low-income self-employed workers for 2026
21st October 2025 -
Real estate associations call for lower taxes and more political agreements to tackle the housing crisis
20th October 2025
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
18th May 2021APPROACH
The objective of these notes is to show how the regulation of the 1975 and 1981 laws is now totally obsolete and in practice implies, in addition to an unjustified privilege in favor of the merchant's or professional's creditors, a clear attack on the principle equality between spouses and especially an attack on women.
As we know, the incorporation of women into the world of work today is massive, but statistics show that in terms of commercial activity, either as self-employed entrepreneurs or as partners and administrators of capital companies, the number of men is much higher than that of women, while these are the majority in other activities different from the commercial one.
Let's take an assumption: marriage in which the husband exercises a commercial activity individually and the wife is a civil servant at the service of the public administration. In this case, what both earn will be community, but, if the husband contracts debts for his aforementioned activity, the creditors may go against ALL THE PROFITS, including those corresponding to the wife, which by the way the creditors outside the said activity of either of the two spouses in debts contracted by only one inasmuch as, except in one of the cases in which the CC directly subject the community property, they could only go against the private property of the debtor and in default of these against their part in the joint property as indicated in art. 1373 which constitutes the general rule in this matter.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960