You do not have any favourites
News
-
What should you take into account when renting an apartment as a tenant?
11th December 2025 -
They have sold me a house with squatters; what can I do?
5th December 2025 -
Congress overturns Sumar’s bill to ban investment funds from buying homes.
27th November 2025 -
What is the most economical heating for an apartment, and why?
21st November 2025 -
Living in Almoradí: best areas, cost of living and main advantages
20th November 2025 -
The PP seeks to amend the Penal Code in the Senate to legalize cutting off utilities in squatted houses.
19th November 2025 -
Feijóo criticizes Sánchez’s housing policy: “He will turn a Spain of homeowners into a Spain of precarious citizens.”
19th November 2025 -
How does the rent increase with the CPI work in 2025?
17th November 2025 -
Feijóo criticizes Sánchez's housing policy:
13th November 2025 -
How to detect fake documentation from a potential tenant
12th November 2025
WHAT ABOUT THE BANKS AND THE GRANTING OF MORTGAGES?
10th September 2021REAL ESTATE, NEXUS GROUP, INFORMA
What about the banks and the granting of mortgages for these cases.
Banks have always been reluctant to grant mortgages in this type of case. The possibility that a person with a better right would appear in the inheritance who could claim it existed if the person who inherited and intended to sell was not a forced heir of the deceased owner, that is, his son, father or husband, which represented a risk for the buyer that its acquisition would not be fully guaranteed during the two years following said death. The consequence of this legal limitation, which temporarily suspended the principle of registration public faith in such cases, was the refusal of many banks to grant mortgages due to the fear of losing the mortgage guarantee.
If article 28 appeared in any operation, no bank was going to give a mortgage. This repeal is very good news, especially because it eliminates a situation of supervening helplessness, which has even sometimes led to the resignation of inheritances, due to the impossibility of selling the property, or the sale well below the market price to buyers who they took advantage of these situations.
The repeal of this article is good news because it will eliminate the uncertainty when granting a mortgage on the assets that took advantage of it and whose protection it considers was unjustified, due to the residual nature of the risk that an unknown forced heir would appear.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960