You do not have any favourites
News
-
ERC pressures the PSOE and brings to Congress its bill to create a tax starting from the third home
30th October 2025 -
Are we becoming a nation of tenants? Rent accounts for 20% of the total.
26th October 2025 -
Hernández Reche: "We are heading towards another housing bubble, although it is different from the one in 2008."
23rd October 2025 -
Rodríguez advocates for intervention in the housing market amid criticism from PP and Sumar.
22nd October 2025 -
The government backtracks and will propose freezing the social security contributions of low-income self-employed workers for 2026
21st October 2025 -
Real estate associations call for lower taxes and more political agreements to tackle the housing crisis
20th October 2025 -
Buying a house with a mortgage: everything you need to know
14th October 2025 -
Sumar presents a royal decree to freeze rents and restrict tourist apartments.
13th October 2025 -
The landlords’ rental requirements: Most houses don’t stay on the market for even 24 hours.
6th October 2025 -
Dampness on terraces: the court clarifies who pays, the owner or the community
1st October 2025
THE DEADLINE TO CLAIM MORTGAGE EXPENSES REACHES THE CJEU
31st August 2021REAL ESTATE, NEXUS GROUP, INFORMA
The Plenary of the First Chamber of the Supreme Court has decided to raise a preliminary ruling before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the beginning of the limitation period of the action for restitution of the amounts paid by the consumer as a result of a null clause on mortgage expenses.
When the parties in dispute were consulted by the Chamber about the advisability of carrying out the consultation, the plaintiff and appellant argued that they considered the submission of the petition appropriate.
Regarding its content, the plaintiff argued that according to the previous jurisprudence of the CJEU it is clear that the initial day of the limitation period cannot be the day of the conclusion of the mortgage loan contract, so the ECJ should be consulted if the term of Prescription of the action for restitution of amounts unduly paid for expenses is the one in which there has been evidence of the abusiveness of the clause by means of its declaration of nullity; or in the opposite case, if said day can coincide with any of the dates of the sentences in which the Supreme Court has declared the abusiveness of this type of clauses.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960