You do not have any favourites
News
-
Ley de Vivienda (Año II): crisis en el alquiler con más demanda, menos oferta y precios disparados
27th May 2025 -
The development of residential complexes for seniors is growing: there are already more than 5,400 housing units
22nd May 2025 -
According to BBVA Research, housing prices will increase by 7.3% in 2025 and by 5.3% in 2026
19th May 2025 -
Home sales surge by 40% and record their best March since 2007
16th May 2025 -
James Bond's mansion in Nice (France) is back on the market for 6.5 million less
16th May 2025 -
INCREASE IN THE BUYING AND SELLING OF HOMES
8th April 2025 -
INCREASE IN HOME PURCHASES BY FOREGNERS
8th April 2025 -
DECREASE IN RENTAL SUPPLY
8th April 2025 -
STRENGTH OF THE REAL ESTATE MARKET DESPITE CHALLENGES
8th April 2025 -
FOR SALE HOMES AND OTHER PROPERTIES WITH DISCOUNTS OF UP TO 64%
21st July 2023
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
24th June 2021Real Estate, Grupo Nexus Informa. CONSIDERATIONS
If we could define the time that we have to live in these moments, we could say that we are in the era of real equality between men and women and of the reforms that try to implement with effective and realistic measures that equality enshrined in the Constitution for more than 30 years. forty years. As proof of this, we find the existence of a Ministry of Equality and I believe that perhaps the time has come to face the reform merely initiated in 1975 and 1981 in order to ensure that nominal equality between spouses is real, and more so in cases such as the one exposed here in which the privilege of the mercantile creditors is normally at the expense (the statistics do not lie) of the non-merchant spouse who is usually a woman and who can see his salary or salary and all his marital assets mercilessly attacked.
I believe that for this reason the creditor of any spouse, merchant or not, should have the right to go directly against ALL THE ASSETS OF THE DEBTOR (art. 1911 CC) and therefore against all their private assets as against all the joint assets that correspond to them, whether been acquired by him or by the other member of the couple (art. 1373 should also be suppressed as it subordinates the creditor's action against the community property to the fact that there are no more private property of the debtor), but the action should be forbidden against assets that as community property correspond to the non-debtor, which by the way is the general rule today except for commercial creditors (art. 1365.2º in fine) or professionals (art. 1365.2º first paragraph) and some others such as of family care (art. 1365.1º) that if in the latter case it would be justified by the nature of the debt, it lacks any motivation in the first two cases.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960