You do not have any favourites
News
-
What should you take into account when renting an apartment as a tenant?
11th December 2025 -
They have sold me a house with squatters; what can I do?
5th December 2025 -
Congress overturns Sumar’s bill to ban investment funds from buying homes.
27th November 2025 -
What is the most economical heating for an apartment, and why?
21st November 2025 -
Living in Almoradí: best areas, cost of living and main advantages
20th November 2025 -
The PP seeks to amend the Penal Code in the Senate to legalize cutting off utilities in squatted houses.
19th November 2025 -
Feijóo criticizes Sánchez’s housing policy: “He will turn a Spain of homeowners into a Spain of precarious citizens.”
19th November 2025 -
How does the rent increase with the CPI work in 2025?
17th November 2025 -
Feijóo criticizes Sánchez's housing policy:
13th November 2025 -
How to detect fake documentation from a potential tenant
12th November 2025
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
24th June 2021Real Estate, Grupo Nexus Informa. CONSIDERATIONS
If we could define the time that we have to live in these moments, we could say that we are in the era of real equality between men and women and of the reforms that try to implement with effective and realistic measures that equality enshrined in the Constitution for more than 30 years. forty years. As proof of this, we find the existence of a Ministry of Equality and I believe that perhaps the time has come to face the reform merely initiated in 1975 and 1981 in order to ensure that nominal equality between spouses is real, and more so in cases such as the one exposed here in which the privilege of the mercantile creditors is normally at the expense (the statistics do not lie) of the non-merchant spouse who is usually a woman and who can see his salary or salary and all his marital assets mercilessly attacked.
I believe that for this reason the creditor of any spouse, merchant or not, should have the right to go directly against ALL THE ASSETS OF THE DEBTOR (art. 1911 CC) and therefore against all their private assets as against all the joint assets that correspond to them, whether been acquired by him or by the other member of the couple (art. 1373 should also be suppressed as it subordinates the creditor's action against the community property to the fact that there are no more private property of the debtor), but the action should be forbidden against assets that as community property correspond to the non-debtor, which by the way is the general rule today except for commercial creditors (art. 1365.2º in fine) or professionals (art. 1365.2º first paragraph) and some others such as of family care (art. 1365.1º) that if in the latter case it would be justified by the nature of the debt, it lacks any motivation in the first two cases.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960