You do not have any favourites
News
-
ERC pressures the PSOE and brings to Congress its bill to create a tax starting from the third home
30th October 2025 -
Are we becoming a nation of tenants? Rent accounts for 20% of the total.
26th October 2025 -
Hernández Reche: "We are heading towards another housing bubble, although it is different from the one in 2008."
23rd October 2025 -
Rodríguez advocates for intervention in the housing market amid criticism from PP and Sumar.
22nd October 2025 -
The government backtracks and will propose freezing the social security contributions of low-income self-employed workers for 2026
21st October 2025 -
Real estate associations call for lower taxes and more political agreements to tackle the housing crisis
20th October 2025 -
Buying a house with a mortgage: everything you need to know
14th October 2025 -
Sumar presents a royal decree to freeze rents and restrict tourist apartments.
13th October 2025 -
The landlords’ rental requirements: Most houses don’t stay on the market for even 24 hours.
6th October 2025 -
Dampness on terraces: the court clarifies who pays, the owner or the community
1st October 2025
Liability of property for business or professional debts and the Commercial Registry
24th June 2021Real Estate, Grupo Nexus Informa. CONSIDERATIONS
If we could define the time that we have to live in these moments, we could say that we are in the era of real equality between men and women and of the reforms that try to implement with effective and realistic measures that equality enshrined in the Constitution for more than 30 years. forty years. As proof of this, we find the existence of a Ministry of Equality and I believe that perhaps the time has come to face the reform merely initiated in 1975 and 1981 in order to ensure that nominal equality between spouses is real, and more so in cases such as the one exposed here in which the privilege of the mercantile creditors is normally at the expense (the statistics do not lie) of the non-merchant spouse who is usually a woman and who can see his salary or salary and all his marital assets mercilessly attacked.
I believe that for this reason the creditor of any spouse, merchant or not, should have the right to go directly against ALL THE ASSETS OF THE DEBTOR (art. 1911 CC) and therefore against all their private assets as against all the joint assets that correspond to them, whether been acquired by him or by the other member of the couple (art. 1373 should also be suppressed as it subordinates the creditor's action against the community property to the fact that there are no more private property of the debtor), but the action should be forbidden against assets that as community property correspond to the non-debtor, which by the way is the general rule today except for commercial creditors (art. 1365.2º in fine) or professionals (art. 1365.2º first paragraph) and some others such as of family care (art. 1365.1º) that if in the latter case it would be justified by the nature of the debt, it lacks any motivation in the first two cases.
info@nexusgrupo.com
0034 965727960